LetThemBuild for teams
Every AI change is independently reviewed by other frontier models that re-run your build and tests on the same machine — and you get a receipt of exactly what passed. Not a model's opinion of its own work. Evidence.
One frontier model leads: it edits files, runs commands, builds. Then the others review — and they can run the same build and tests themselves. Each check is recorded from what actually executed: the command, its exit code, the result.
Agreement without a check is visible as agreement without a check. Agreement despite a failing check is flagged. Nothing is marked done until every reviewer genuinely endorses it — with evidence.
Verification receipt
3 of 4 checks passed — not agreedClaude led. Three reviewers re-ran the work on the same machine. What they ran and what came back:
| ChatGPT | $ npm test | exit 0 | 142 passing |
| Gemini | $ npm run build | exit 0 | compiled, 0 warnings |
| Grok | $ npx tsc --noEmit | exit 0 | no type errors |
| ChatGPT | $ npm run lint | exit 1 | 2 errors in auth.ts |
A reviewer that says “looks good” without running anything is shown as exactly that. A reviewer that agrees despite a failing check is flagged as a contradiction. The receipt is built from what ran — never from what a model claims it ran.
Lead
Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini or Grok — your choice — works in an isolated git worktree of the repo: reads, edits, builds, tests. Your checkout is never touched.
Review
The other models get read-only tools on the same machine. They open the files, re-run the build and tests, and object with specifics — or agree, with the command that convinced them.
Receipt
You see who ran what, what came back, and whether the room agreed. Merge, open a PR, or send it back — the decision is yours, and it is an informed one.
The facts a security review needs, stated plainly. Where something is in progress, it says so.
Each seat on your organization’s own provider accounts. No markup, and on the desktop, no transit through us.
Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Grok Build — reviewers run on the subscriptions your developers already have.
One bill, prepaid credit, cost + 30%. Zero setup for a pilot; per-seat budgets keep it predictable.
Team seats are $49 per member per month, everything included. See pricing. Enterprise agreements (SSO, audit export, DPA, self-hosted sync) are priced per organization.
Ten seats, your repositories, one measurable question: how many defects did a reviewer catch that the lead missed? We'll set it up with you.
Start the conversation